|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Moac Tor
Cy-Core Industries Stain Confederation
159
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
The main reason T3 destroyers are so good in my view is they are so ISK efficient in terms of insurance.
In terms of the actual ships themselves I'd say they are in a pretty good place. Assault frigates really need looking at though as since T3s there is really no need to use them.
Assault frigates need buffs and then that change alone should push T3s into a much better place in terms of the meta.
Looking forward to the results of these discussions though. It is good to see CCP trying to involve the community.
Suggestion for a rebalance of ECM - Modulated ECM Effects
|
Moac Tor
Cy-Core Industries Stain Confederation
160
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 01:30:09 -
[2] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:i don't quite see how t3ds are in any way related to AFs, because before t3ds we flew interdictors if we wanted something solid and also can enter small plexes. People who used to use AFs now use T3s. There are only a few edge cases where it is worth using an AF over a T3. Also AFs would be dangerous to a T3 if they were half decent as they counter one of the main advantages of the T3 which is its low signature. So once AFs are in a good place that will naturally balance T3s in the overall meta.
Suggestion for a rebalance of ECM - Modulated ECM Effects
|
Moac Tor
Cy-Core Industries Stain Confederation
279
|
Posted - 2015.10.27 12:59:53 -
[3] - Quote
When is this focus group happening? I am waiting to see what your going to do to Tac Destroyers.
I hope there isn't much of a nerf as I find these ships interesting and fun to fly. Perhaps just increase their sig radius, and then buff AFs.
Modulated ECM Effects
An Alternative to Skill Trading
|
Moac Tor
Cy-Core Industries Stain Confederation
279
|
Posted - 2015.10.27 13:12:27 -
[4] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote:Hecate and Jackdaw are fairly well balanced. 10mn AB Confessor is fairly strong but relies on cap for everything it does (armor buffer builds are pretty weak IMO). Svipul is just way too strong. Not just 10mn Svipuls but also mwd fits just because base speed (speed while scrammed) on prop mode is still faster than frigates so it will still dictate range even in most of those scenarios.
The prop mode for the Svipul and Confessor need to changed to a % increase to speed provided by AB or MWD, and not an increase to the base speed. In autocannon fits I practically never switch to sharpshooter mode or defensive mode. The base speed increase on prop mode helps you mitigate more damage when fighting vs cruisers than defensive mode, and allows for more transversal/range dictation for damage application when fighter vs things smaller than cruisers than sharpshooter mode. Well balanced in regards to how op the svipul is yes, but not in regards to the other ships out there. Its the best one in terms of balance but while it is by far the worst t3d it isnt a bad ship. Your reply was a little confusing, but I think you mean to say the Svipul is OP. This is why I said increase sig radius across the board above, the Svipul is the one which would be hurt the most by that.
Modulated ECM Effects
An Alternative to Skill Trading
|
Moac Tor
Cyber Core Stain Confederation
700
|
Posted - 2016.08.27 18:40:55 -
[5] - Quote
It is only really the Svipul, and Confessor to a lesser degree, that need nerfing (mainly due to their high speed and low sig combination). The Jackdaw and Hecate are in a good place IMO.
Rather than a massive nerf hammer being bought down as some are suggesting, I'm hoping to see a sensible approach to balancing the T3 destroyers.
Modulated ECM Effects
An Alternative to Skill Trading
|
|
|
|